Quantcast
Channel: CURRENT OBSESSION
Viewing all 598 articles
Browse latest View live

Launch in Munich

$
0
0
The first issue of Current Obsession Magazine will be presented during Schmuck 2013 week 6-12 March in Munich. Current Obsession Magazine will be available on several locations around the city. Here is the list of locations where the magazine will be presented and sold during Schmuck: Inside the 'Handwerk&Design' Fair at Messegelände Munchen our magazine will be sold by Chrome Yellow Books at the Hall B1, located at the FRAME project 6th of March 12.00-13.00 We will be presenting at the Chrome Yellow Books stand at the Messegelände Munchen Hall B1, located at the FRAME project 19.00-22.00 We will be presenting and selling at the Schmuck-Show at Goldbergstudios Müllerstrasse 46A 7th of March Current Obsession Magazine Launch Party! 8th of March 9th of March 16.20 We will have the opportunity to present our magazine on stage of the 'Handwerk&Design' at the Messegelände Munchen. We will tell a bit about our project, present the team and share our plans for the future! 10th of March 11th of March 12th of March Our launch in Munich will be created in collaboration with Hanemaai and her project My Infinite Home Tool

Karl Fritsch

Manon van Kouswijk

Marjan van Aubel

Ulrich Reithofer

$
0
0
SOMETIMES YELLOW, SOMETIMES BROWN Current Obsession: Imagine going back to Austria and meeting an old classmate who became a wealthy farmer. He is asking you what do you do? Ulrich Reithofer: I live in Amsterdam, I make jewellery. Mainly unique pieces. I use gold and also precious materials, but I also use a lot of other stuff like wood, glass, etc. C.O: What would be the definition for you: I'm a contemporary artist, I'a jeweller, I'm a craftsman. U.R.: I am contemporary because I'm now. And I'm a jeweller because thats what I'm aiming for, is to be carried away, taken with someone. That the work is possibly given as a present with meaning of something related to jewellery: birthday, wedding, engagement... I just made a ring for a new born baby and his mother and this is how I'm a jeweller. C.O: Why did you choose jewellery as a medium? Why not expressing yourself through sculpture? U.R.: Well, I anyway do sculpture, because a ring is a sculpture, brooch is a sculpture, parts of a necklace are always sculptural. But sculpture is based on the ground, there is a relation to the human body in size, but it is based somewhere and stays there. The jewellery is somehow worn and at a certain moment comes to the body and creates this personal relation with the body, it communicates only through the body. And the sculpture would not do that. C.O.: So the act of wear is important for you, its not to be sitting in the box or hang on the wall? U.R.: It is OK for me, but the object that I make, this sculpture has to imply the use. Even if its not wearable, even if it hurts when worn, then there is a statement about the non-wearability. But the human relation that lies in dimension to the body is important. C.O.: About the work itself, how it looks now and what it embodies, how did you come to this? U.R.: Its about putting things in a different prospective. Say, the chair, we know it as a furniture object in the room. What happens to the object in the room when its worn on the body? Its the irritation that communicates. I think jewellery has to irritate to work. It has to be something that does not physically belong to you. It is not a pimple on your thumb, or a scratch on your cheek. It is something strange, but then does it communicate? Sometimes it just doesn't. But sometimes someone will ask: “Why does she wear a fucking chair?!” That would mean I achieved my goal – I started a communication. C.O: When did this goal come into work? U.R.: I think it started in Idar-Oberstein. I made brooches with ready-made safety pins. It was an easy way out. I made pieces, but then I wanted to connect them to the body somehow. So what is the easy way? Take a safety pin and just stick your clothes! Then Theo (Theo Smiths, the professor at Idar-Oberstein) said, this is not true jewellery, because you use something existing and then put it to your artwork in order to connect it to the body. So then I decided to justify the safety pin as my means to jewellery. To prove that I'm allowed to do this, because that is what I wanted to do: use a ready-made together with my creation to get carried around on the body. And then I made a piece. It was a golden frame for a painting, on the back there was a safety pin, nailed with about 100 nails. And on the lower part, where you usually have a title of the painting it said, cut out of silver: “Ambitiously covered safety pin as a piece of jewellery”. So a lot of work invested into something that is just a safety pin. I realized I can do anything I want as long as it is a “round thing”, as long as it makes sense. C.O.: So how did things proceed in Sandberg? U.R.: Idar-Oberstein was only about jewellery. Theres is only one academy dedicated to jewellery, and there was not much to talk about besides jewellery. And all art got somehow integrated from a point of view of jewellery. At Sandberg it changed completely. Suddenly I saw that concerns with the condition of the discipline happen in every field. If you are an architect, you also “find yourself” in the field that is “dying out” and there is “no future”, and the ceramists, glass artists, etc. have the same problem. You don't see that this field is so much bigger then you, then your school, your education...My graduation piece for the Rietveld was a collaboration with a theatre school graduate. And she did a theatre performance and asked me if I could make a jewellery for her show, which meant making the stage. So I was hanging lamps, throwing cables around, had a little jewellery show at the entrance... Collaborations is what I do and I think is important for my work. C.O.: So if making sculpture or theatre design also counts, then its not about making only wearable work? U.R.: You've asked me to give you a visualization of the field, which gave me some pain... Because it very difficult to see us as a field for me. I see us more as a color. I see jewellery as a color, as much as architecture as a color, as much as painting as a color, as much as music as a color. We are a strong color and we tend to mix, we love to go with the blu, with the red, and the more we mix, the more we loose form our main source, main color. C.O.: Which is the color for you? U.R.: Sometimes Yellow, sometimes Brown. For me all the jewellery schools are one color. And some want to blend with the Red of Sculpture, so someone goes into the sculpture, someone goes into architecture, someone goes into fashion, music etc. But the stronger you realize your own color the stronger you can blend in with other colors. Without loosing your own. And so thats why I try to blend in with these purple theatre people, blue architects and orange photographers, because its interesting and it comes back into my own discipline. I think its very important that each individual finds its own blending. I think there are so many more jewellery intellectuals now compared to the time when Otto Kunzli started. Pigment became so much stronger, there are so many particles in our color. And of course we can blend easier with other colors. C.O.: So you see it as a virtue? U.R.: Yes, absolutely. Many of these attempts might not be successful, and maybe I will find myself blending with too many other colors that my original color either will fade away, or... I will find my own in-between color that is only mine. C.O.: So you are not concerned with loosing ourselves at the mercy of these great fields who might not even recognize jewellery? U.R.: No, think about it. I am sure there is now somewhere in the world a young painting student talking to another more experienced painter. They are having exactly the same conversation as we have. I don't think we have to be insecure. This exists much more in fashion for example, because it is so much bigger. To get to the hight of Galliano who is a lot in the media right now, you have to fight so much harder than you have to fight as a jeweller! In the end we can say we came a long way and have a higher potential than Otto Kunzli had in his time. C.O.: The struggles are different. For example Herman Junger. He had to break out of the german traditional school. Breaking symmetry, smooth surfaces. That was his main concern. Proving them wrong. U.R.: It could be we are further now, but maybe we are still at the same spot. C.O.: We came to a full circle. Herman Junger breaking off from the craft and tradition and our nowadays search to get back to them and revive the craft. U.R.: Nowadays we try to speed up the process a little bit, making things that are glued, and stringed together, but the expression is there. The piece has to be out, has to be seen and worn. The excitement of creation is great. But now the piece falls apart because the primary concern was not finishing, but expressing! So now there is another step to be made: I want to keep the same look but how do I manage for it to become a durable piece? This is recognizable as a problem that every artist has. One step forward and two steps back. If you use new materials, as an architecture, it is possible that the house could collapse. C.O.: So, the way you relate to craft is more a way of shaping a message? U.R.: Well yes, but now I only start to regret that I cheated a little a bit on my education. I missed out on things that I got the paper for. Now I find out that some of these skills I really need. C.O.: Like what? U.R.: Cutting a straight line, finally fucking straight! Now I find myself calling someone to do it for me. Which is fine to the extend that you also have to find a way to supply that. The money and calls I need to make to get it done. Is that than also a craft? And if it is then I also need to learn a craft of how to arrange the money... U.R.: For me making a a good piece is about having a set of good skills. I don't need to know them in the beginning. But in the moment I start to mess around a with stones, it gets interesting how people did it back in the day...In general craft is under-evaluated. Bauhaus was communicating the idea that “by saying you can't teach art you are saying you have to learn the craft”.1 Walter Gropius said : “We train a new generation of architects by not teaching architecture”, but by teaching them how to make furniture, masonry, how to use wood, stone etc. They had a point I think. They go back to the basics of what makes you a good creator. There is so much confusion out there...I created a small brooch and it gives you, me, and someone who is watching a little piece of silence in this whole chaos. You want to take apart this big thing into smaller symbols, so it gets graspable. So you start to understand the world step by step: how blue and green work together, how triangle and a circle work together – and thats craft. C.O.: Where does the source of you work lay? U.R.: It is the chaos out there that I don't know how to handle without making things I can grasp, making them visual and then communicate with others: “Do you see the world like me? Understand it like me? Oh, good! You see it different? Also good!”. This is the subject it all comes down to. C.O.: You put a lot of meanings in your work. It is full of information. I chose these three of your works: For me the work is about the wearability, because something happens in the wearing. U.R.: Its interesting that you chose these three, because they all mark a period of time: one was the first after Idar-Oberstein, second one was my first after Sandberg, and the third is my first solo show. It shows what I'm looking for in the collier: its a closed circle, like a movie or a symphony: you starting somewhere, you give the introduction, then you develop the theme, you come to the main part and then you let it clean out – that's a collier. And of course in each work I make, I try to emphasize one story. Sometimes I mess up and tell three. But if I manage, I tell one story. In “Hope” its about two families, mama, papa and a daughter. You are raised by parents and now its time you are pushed out, suddenly you start waking on your own. That is how I felt at the time. I started to study at Idar-oberstein because I wanted to work with stone, but after two years the amount of stone work decreased and the amount of wood carving and sculptural elements increased. So here I have a big sculptural part that is wood and around it there are these stones, with hope that one day I'll come back to the stone. Also, the concept of hope is always identified with the color green, but I'm not sure its correct, so I made a black collier with pink stones. C.O.: I think it is a heavy piece. In many ways. When I first saw it, I thought carrying such a heavy story on the body is somewhat groundbreaking. U.R.: There is a constant discussion in our field on when does a piece of jewellery become unwearable by carrying too much of personal information. And I'm very aware of that. Because the second piece is so fucking personal I don't even want to talk about it..! But I was lucky that there is a certain element to it that made it more general. C.O.: But I don't thing its luck or magic, its actually quite logical that if you are working with something highly personal and strong for you, the viewer can relate to this high concentration on emotional level without having to know the original story. U.R.: Its like Mozart's Requiem. He is so emotionally wrecked by the death of his father, that Salieri knows he will die making this piece. And no matter when and where you hear this piece, it no longer relates to Mozart, it relates personally to you. C.O.: So you feel that you have achieved that somehow? U.R.: I'm working on it. Which means I create, I pile things up, and then I start to cut away, in the process I try to stay as communicative as possible and then show work to the people I trust. And they tell me what they see. Sometimes it does not tell the story, but sometimes HA..! It does not tell my story, it tells THE story! “Conspiracy” was made in time of crisis. Its about the few big ones that tell us how we are so little. But the minute we create a group we a stronger. And that is what I see happening in our field. We don't now where are we going, its because there is no compound, no group development, no manifestos. There is no giving up personal achievements for the sake of common achievements in order to understand what is important for the field. Instead we see individual points of view, personal understanding of certain problems. Up until the beginning of the twentieth century as a painter you were a part of a movement. And we are a part of a big movement, but no one knows what it is because no one can define it as a whole. C.O.: It happens because of the fact that there is no critical discourse in the field? U.R.: There is no hierarchy. No one is busy with analyzing facts as, for example: “ So-and-so started this movement then and there, these people have followed, and made this development, and thats why this piece has certain significance”. It hardly ever happens in this way. And I feel that in fine arts of fashion the popularity of the field is so high that certain people instead of making start writing about it. And as a maker you are busy with communicating with the work, rather then communicating with words.So if one wants do dedicate himself to writing, he learns the skills and begins writing. But I'm not giving up my career, and it happens in all the jewellery schools. There are so many talented people there, but no one wants to swap over to the verbal, intellectual part. And thats why they founded the “Academia Del Disegno” in Rome, the first school dedicated to teaching art. They wanted to create a verbal language to the language of art. They wanted to find a verbalization of what is happening visually. C.O.: Manifestos and writing about your position within the field made people like Herman Junger and Otto Kunzli more important and weighty. U.R.: Exactly. So if you had a manifesto you would be more appreciated. Its like the impressionists have put down into words that they want to paint outside because they are sick of the studio light. And people who perceive art through verbal language first will always dig something where they are more intellectually stimulated. So the Impressionism becomes immediately successful because there was a clear manifesto, where they stated their ideas. And thats the moment when it becomes more open to “mixing with other colors”. I start painting and I immediately call my writer friend to come over, drink some wine and talk about my work. We shall step out of our circles and deal with other people. We have to start involving others in order to grow. The future is bright. The field is infinite. You can learn and apply any science, craft, philosophy to jewellery making. The beauty is in these infinite possibilities and openness. You have Shcmuck in Munich, where you see latest developments of the contemporary jewellery, but few weeks before that there is Inhorgenta1, a huge fair of craft jewellery, and it is also valid, it has its place. C.O.: What is a perfect piece of jewellery? U.R.: Perfect Jewel. For me the first perfect jewel I saw was a “Tear Bucket” by Dinie Bessems. It was a very simple shape. A black ring. On top of it sits a little black cup. And this cup is to contain a tear. And because of water's qualities to round up due to its surface tension, the top becomes a perfect bead : on the bottom - metal, on top – water. “Tear Bucket”. The title and the picture make you cry when you see it. For me it is a perfect jewel. ____________________________________________________ Marina Elenskaya for Current Obsession. 04.03.2011

Places to buy Current Obsession Magazine

$
0
0
Amsterdam Athenaeum Boekhandel Spui 14-16 www.athenaeum.nl Gallery Ra Nes 120 www.galerie-ra.nl Eindhoven You Are Here Conceptstore Kleine Berg 32a www.youarehere.nl You can purchase the magazine online from our webshop If you would like to become our retailer, please contact us: magazine@current-obsession.com

Launch in Munich

$
0
0
The first issue of Current Obsession Magazine The Archetype was launched during Schmuck 2013 6-12 March in Munich. We chose the means of mobile presentation and collaborated with Hanemaai and her project My Infinite Home Tool. Her amazingly designed and crafted wooden luggages/displays fit perfectly with our idea of a light and efficient presentation. Images by Hanemaai (thumbnail), Chris van der Kaap, Kellie Riggs

ÄDELLAB babes: Yenny Marklund

$
0
0
Rainbow Warriors - Statementeers of unity in diversity I have namned my non-violent activists, statementeers. They are the musketeers of statements. Wearing peace-pieces instead of weapons. A chainmail is traditionally used as bodyprotection against violence. These are hundreds of individual rings, linked together to form a strong unit. I have used iron to tell the story of war, and I handmade rainbowcoloured aluminum to disarm and twist the meaning of a don't-kill-me-chainmail to a together-we-are-all-strong-peace-pieces!

David Bielander by Anja Schori

S.O.A.P.P.

$
0
0
S.O.A.P.P. Shredded Obsession Addictive Pleasure Piece Atelier Ted Noten + Current Obsession Magazine @ Mode Biënnale Arnhem We like to destroy and to create. We like to seduce and to attack. We love our audience and want to trigger their thoughts. S.O.A.P.P. - Shredded Obsession Addictive Pleasure Piece - is a collaboration between Atelier Ted Noten and Current Obsession Magazine. S.O.A.P.P. is a performance about destroying and simultaneously creating something new. Current Obsession Magazine – a publication entirely dedicated to jewellery - will be taken apart page by page and slipped into a golden shredder and transformed into raw material base for S.O.A.P.P. - a fetishist three-dimensional object/jewellery. S.O.A.P.P. from Current Obsession on Vimeo. http://current-obsession.com http://www.tednoten.com Concept by Marcel van Kan Photography/Viedo by DAN/NAD

SCHMUCK GUIDE

$
0
0
SCHMUCK GUIDE Current Obsession Magazine includes a complete Schmuck Guide 2013: Map of Munich | Subway map | Messegelande Halle B01 map + Complete list of events featured in Schmuck week 6-12 March + Thumbnail images of featured work + Quirky and sharp preview comments by our contributing writer Kellie Riggs + List of great places to eat in Munich put together for us by a local Münchner Daniela Stoof Printed Schmuck Guide is included with the Current Obsession Magazine for 14.90€ and sold separately for 4.90€ Download Schmuck Guide 2013 (PDF) We hope you'll enjoy Schmuck 2013 with our Guide content: Kellie Riggs editor: Marina Elenskaya design: Sarah Mesrtiz, Anna Hennerdal, Linda Beumer

Manon van Kouswijk

Marjan van Aubel

Akiko Kurihara

CSM babes: Percy Lau

$
0
0
Materials: crystal clear resin, acrylic sheet and rods Photography: Rachel@ IM STUDIO Model: Max Walker http://percylau.com

The Power of Dialogue

$
0
0
A New Movement in Japan Chain bracelet GIFTED Japan is no exception to many new movements going on in the world of jewellery today. Take a look at the new galleries specializing in art jewellery along with the emerging network of brands and it's clear that art jewellery is finally starting to gain recognition in Japan. Hiroki Masuzaki was the first part of this new movement to catch my eye. Up until now, people aspiring to play an active role in the international scene usually established their base overseas, or displayed their works at international exhibitions while staying in Japan. Hiroki chose a path less familiar. In his search for a uniquely Japanese form of expression taken from a fresh perspective, he decided to establish his own show room in Japan, something that had never been attempted in the Japanese jewellery scene. He enrolled in the Art Jewellery Course at Hiko Mizuno College of Jewellery with aspirations to study abroad. His efforts paid off for the first time in 2004 when he was selected as a participant in Three Schools Project. This prestigious exhibition is held irregularly every few years and features selected student works from three rotating international art colleges—in this case, the Sandberg Institute in the Netherlands, the Academy of Fine Arts in Munich, and the Hiko Muzuno College of Jewellery in Japan. Hiroki toured three countries, learning by experimenting with new ways of presenting his works as he gained new international friends. On the other hand, it also taught him the negative aspects of the jewellery scene in European countries. In 2009 he was accepted into Gerrit Rietveld Academie in the Netherlands, though by that time his motivation had plummeted. He felt that “the scene in Europe no longer had a promising outlook. I knew that I had to visit firsthand specifically to find what kept the artisans motivated, how they continued to create amidst the naysaying.” Arriving in the Netherlands, he found that the artists had similar questions and fears about the jewellery scene. They couldn't take a step back to judge it objectively, must less step out of it. Just a short month after enrolling, Hiroki went back to Japan. Here he shifted his attention to the art jewellery scene in Japan that he had ignored for so long, only to find that there was no clearly defined scene or proper history. This brought him to think that, if European artists were stuck in an established art jewellery scene, then Japan could be a place for pioneers. In doing so, he could not ignore how commercial jewellery permeates the public sphere in Japan. For him, commercial jewellery entails meaningless jewellery that resorts to commercialism—rings sold with candy to children, fancy silver jewellery for young boys, accessories made of gold, silver, and other materials for young girls. Jewellery is available for every age group and for both sexes—a Japan-only phenomenon according to Hiroki. And nobody, at least in the field of art jewellery, has ever tried to work with commercial jewellery. This helped him think of a new method, where working on both commercial and artistic jewellery might allow him to reveal the reason why contemporary jewellery has failed to secure a foothold in Japan. Presenting this truth could be his way to suggest a new paradigm for jewellery. Where others would use commercial jewellery as an inspiration for art, Hiroki is unique in the strategic way he clearly differentiates between commercial jewellery and art jewellery, while at the same time considering both as equivalent medias for his artistic expression. Hiroki chose silver jewellery for his commercial jewellery line in launching the brand GIFTED with Masao Takahashi, a friend and longtime associate from his student days. Pieces from GIFTED maintain the size and style of conventional silver jewellery and are designed for everyday use. While they look different than his previous artistic pieces, they still share a connection. For example, some feature past designs, while others are conceptual, such as the combination of silver and iron to call up images of life and death. The matte finish of these works create an aura of tranquility. Hiroki likens the GIFTED collection to a tabula rasa—a fitting description for jewellery that changes its appearance as it spends time with the wearer. Emptyframenecklace oval GIFTED Emptyframenecklace square GIFTED All created under the name of GIFTED Material: Silver Year: 2011 Their artistic line is much more conceptual. One item is a ring with a single word, “TODAY,” engraved on the surface. This piece was inspired by the March 11th 2011 Japan earthquake and nuclear accident that caused intense human and physical tragedy, along with intense shock and confusion across the nation. Having lived through the event, we, the people of Japan, must questions what 'today' means to us everyday when think of the present, the day of the earthquake, and the days after it. We can no longer live today feeling like we did before that day. Title:TODAY Item:Ring/Object Material:Silver,Soil,Sample bottle,(Paper,Ink) Year:2013 Title : Memento Item : Brooch Material : Iron,Paint Year : 2009 The inside of the ring contains engravings of the edition number, Hiroki Masuzaki's, and the text “MADE IN JAPAN.” To Hiroki, the earthquake gave this phrase a new meaning. Just as the March 11th earthquake changed how Japan thinks of 'today,' it also drastically changed how to world thinks of Japan. Hiroki has another project—one to establish a unique voice for Japan in the world of art jewellery. He thinks that the late Kazuhiro Ito’s work had the potential to realize this goal, but his sudden death cut this possibility short. As some readers may know, Ito was an artist and teacher who played an important role from the late 1970s to 1990s and impacted many artists, including Jun Konishi, but not enough to set a trend for later generations. Ito's pieces are characterized by their strong modern art influence, especially Japanese modern art, which shows the inner power of its materials in a subdued manner. Hiroki, having studied under Ryuichiro Nakamura, one of Ito’s students, has positioned himself along Ito's lineage. This project aims to create comprehensive documents of Ito’s activities that currently exist only as fragments. Jun Konishi Title : Skull Teddy Item : Necklace Material : Plastic,Silver Year : 2005 Jun Konishi Title : the best in japan Item : brooch Material : silver,plastic,rubber,lacquer Year : 1998 Ryuichiro Nakamura Title : Hurt Item : Brooch Material : Iron Year : 2001 Ryuichiro Nakamura Title : King Of The Sun Item : Necklace Material : Silver Year : 2008 All of these activities are based in the city of Kokura, a five-hour bullet train ride from Tokyo. Hiroki had his reasons to move from Tokyo. It's the hometown of his wife, Akiko, but more importantly, far removed from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, which experienced a partial meltdown after the cooling system failed due to the March 11th tsunami. Tokyo and Fukushima are about 200km apart, but who can say how far is safe enough when it comes to radioactive contamination? He chose to desert Tokyo with his wife, rather than risk the danger of growing complacent beneath the shadow of Fukushima. Most recently, he opened the show room HOLIC last November, which exhibits jewellery by Japanese artists, including GIFTED, his personal brand. HOLIC is located on a recessed street corner, so you can't see inside unless you open the door. It's cramped quarters can barely squeeze in three people. There is a workbench on the left and a glass case on the right. Customers chat with Hiroki over this counter. Dialogue is his driving force. He talks with customers to build solid relationships, the kind he couldn’t find in Tokyo. He hashes out ideas with Akiko to develop concepts or find viewpoints within himself that he would never have thought of otherwise. He listens to the stories of artists he is dealing with to understand their ideas and personalities. All these conversation will fuel his future projects. Hiroki's next step is to expand his activities to the international scene. Have a chat with him—be part of this new movement. Hiroki Masuzaki Title : SELFPORTRAIT Item : Brooch Material : Photograph,Silver,Paint year : 2009 Makiko Akiyama for Current Obsession Translation assistance and editing by David Kracker HOLIC | JEWELLRY & REFABRIC THINGS 103 SENBA ESTATE BLDG.7-14 Senbamachi Kokurakita-ku Kitakyushu Fukuoka 802-0007 JAPAN www.gallery-holic.com info@gallery-holic.com

María Aparicio Puentes

$
0
0
For the #1 issue of the Current Obsession magazine we collaborated with a visual artist María Aparicio Puentes, Santiago de Chile. María's work consists of embroidery on images, mainly black and white. Despite the two-dimensional medium, her work has a lot to do with a relationships between a human figure, body extensions and space. We've asked María to work with selected vintage images that had significance to the team of the CO. Please see more works here.

The Way of The Future: Chen Chen & Kai Williams

$
0
0
We interviewed Brooklyn-based product design duo Chen & Williams. Their partnership began in spring of 2011 and for almost a year they have been spotted creating psychedelic coasters and jewellery through slicing studio junk mixed with resin, assembling "weapons of opportunity" inspired by prison, casting sculptural bookends and waterjet-cutting sleek bracelets out of Blue Bahia granite and marble… The full interview with Chen & Williams is featured in the Current Obsession Magazine #1

RCA babes: James Stoklund

$
0
0
A utensil is not just a utensil Everyone knows the feeling of having a spoon in their mouth or the sound of a fork against the plate; these are experiences we have known since we were born. The collection of tableware is inspired by my own joy for functional things. And it is this joy I want to pass on to others. E.g. I have found a great spoon for eating my oats in the morning, which has the perfect cup size for the ideal mouthful of oat. This is a good example of a spoon that is not just a spoon, but a utensil underlining and enhancing a dinning experience. Hence, a specific dish should be delivered with the right utensil; the food, its texture and taste should be incorporated in the design of a utensil. I try to adopt a problem solving approach to my design: I have found it annoying not being able to get all food from a ceramic plate; you keep on scraping with a spoon or fork but there will always be leftovers on the plate. Thus my idea for the plate “Lick it clean” appeared to help you scoop up all the food. Simultaneously, the idea for the glass “shake that booty”, emerged to help aerate spirits during the drinking experience whilst the rubbery egg cup is inspired by the annoying one-size-fits-all egg cups you normally buy at shops. Eggs come in different sizes, but industrially produced eggcups do not and the rubbery eggcup allows for different egg sizes. At the same time, when I initially pushed an egg through the silicone, I found the movement to reflect the way a hen lays an egg, which for me was very satisfying. In addition to having graduated from Royal College of Art, I have a background in Silversmithing and have produced expensive silver tableware for many years. I have experienced people acquire tableware only to put it in a cupboard even though it has been produced carefully to serve a function. Due to this experience, I decided to produce objects people want to use or objects that attract people to use them. Most of the tableware we use today has had its look since the 17th century. E.g. the fork as we know it today, has had its looks for 300 years. Compared to the evolution of food, the evolution of tableware is protracted and needs to fit the current food trends. Who says the design of knife and fork are the most efficient for our contemporary society, when it has not been challenged for so many years? Everyone knows the feeling of having a spoon in their mouth or the sound of a fork against the plate; these are experiences we have known since we were born. However, most of us do not question the function of these everyday life utensils and what a simple change can do. Thus the design needs innovation and development in order to activate people eating. The dinner experience has been passivated, neglected and appears mechanical without social context. New and innovative eating tools can challenge the eaters and the traditional perception of tableware. I create functional objects for the tabletop that surprise and manipulate people’s normal actions or conceptions to enrich the experience of dining. I challenge the traditional way we eat or pick up food but at the same time consider the food and its consistency in a playful way. My intent with this series of tableware is not to give the users an experience, but hopefully a better dinner experience, different from what they are used to.

Tarja Tuupanen

$
0
0
NOTIONS OF SKILL The background of this project is about skill, the core concept within craft. The term is embedded in the craft field and loaded with values and preconceptions. How is it discussed today and what does it really mean to the maker? The traditional stone working skill is my most precious tool; it is my fetish and my lifeline. My practice is dominated by one material — stone. The relationship to it is so thorough that it becomes more than just a material to begin with. Yet, what happens when this skill encounters ready-made marble tableware, tacky candleholders or salt shakers from the 80s or mass-produced items instead of raw material? How does it change the work, the values and the control of skills?
Viewing all 598 articles
Browse latest View live